The Big Money Lie

“Are you tired of living from paycheck to paycheck? Have you ever observed a need that you longed to meet, but you didn’t have the finances to help? Do you yearn to sow freely into the needs of the ministry? Do you want more out of life for you and your family? If so, you need the School of Prosperity!”

These words are copied directly from the website of the “Christian Ministry” of a man named Creflo Dollar. I had not even heard of him until I saw an online story about how God had “told” him that the ministry needed a new $65 million private jet. Apparently travelling around the world proclaiming the good news cannot be accomplished if you travel coach.

Mr. Dollar is sadly not alone in his teaching.

On his website Jerry Savelle states his ministry “exists to teach people around the world how to live in God’s blessing, experience His favor, and become the winner in life that He has called them to be” and to “Motivate people, no matter who they are, to develop a “no quit” faith and to receive God’s favor on their finances.”

Kenneth Hagin, in an article on his website writes, “When it comes to the realm of the natural, so many people don’t see the truth that God wants them to prosper financially and walk in divine health.”

There are many, many other similar preachers in America proclaiming a message of financial prosperity. To those outside these churches the message seems obviously and even comically false. How could anyone believe that God’s plan of redemption would have a financial focus?

The answer can be found in scripture. Near the end of his life the Apostle Paul wrote these words to his protégé Timothy, “For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.” 2 Timothy 4:3-4

People naturally seek out pastors who will tell them what they want to hear. In a society obsessed with material wealth, a culture where a person at the US “poverty line” has annual income higher than 85% of the world’s population, and a society obsessed with immediate gratification it should not surprise us that people want to be told that they can and should have more. They believe the lie they want to hear.

What angers me the most about this theology is not the manner in which it deceives so many (although that does tick me off.) What angers me most is the way it trivializes and diminishes God. An Eternal God by very definition must be concerned about eternal things. Acting as if this life is all that matters denies God’s nature, plan and intent. It is a heresy that must be rejected and mocked at every opportunity.

-       Bart

 Thanks for reading. Feel free to comment, question or share with friends. You can subscribe to the blog by clicking on the subscribe button or follow me on twitter @bartbarrettmd

 

Sex in our Heads. Adultery Part 6

A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Far too many of us waste our minds by filling them with terrible things. When it comes to sexual sin it is corrupt thinking, believing that sex is only about pleasure, which leads people astray. Although God intended the sexual act to be intensely pleasurable it is not pleasure but intimacy and oneness that God desires for His people. When people focus on pleasure instead of intimacy there is a tendency to devalue the beauty of the oneness that God intended.

Jesus’ New Testament teaching about adultery confirms that evil-mindedness is at the heart of the seventh commandment. Jesus specifically addresses wrong attitudes about sexuality in His teaching on adultery in Matthew 5.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” (Matt 5:27–28)

The key to understanding Jesus’ teaching lies in what it means to “look on a woman lustfully.” It is not just looking at a woman that is the issue. Jesus is not asking men to go through life with blinders on. Jesus’ words indicate that it is not just the look but something in the way that the woman is being looked at that is the source of the sin. It is a lustful look, not just a glance, against which Jesus is speaking. It is that type of look that Jesus equates with adultery.

What is a “lustful” look? The word in the Greek translated as “lustful” means “to long for” or “to desire.” The term implies that the person is not desiring relationship, intimacy, and marriage. The desire and longing that characterizes the look is purely physical. It is a desire for pleasure. The “luster” desires the other person in a physical sense only. There is no thought of the person’s life, feelings, or standing with God. (Such thinking would by its very nature prevent illegitimate sexual desire!) The lustful person is thinking only of himself, of the pleasure to be gained. This is the type of look of which Jesus is speaking. It is a leer that ignores the heart and soul of the woman. It objectifies her and makes her nothing more than a physical source of pleasure. It is dehumanizing.

The story of David and Bathsheba provides an excellent example of such sinful gazing. We read in the story that David first saw Bathsheba bathing. Stumbling across a beautiful woman who happens to be bathing is not in and of itself sinful. But it is clear that as David looked at Bathsheba, the look became something more than a brief unintentional glance. The look evolved into wanton lust. Although David may have initially been innocent, at some point the sinful attitude toward women that he had previously allowed to possess his heart took over. Just as he had with Abigail years earlier, David viewed Bathsheba as someone who could please him. He wanted Bathsheba for himself, and he felt entitled to her.

David’s lust was evident in the actions that followed. He inquired as to who Bathsheba was, not because he was concerned about her life, but because he wanted her. The report that she was married did nothing to squelch his desire. The urge for pleasure controlled his thoughts and drove his actions. David’s adultery was the physical expression of what was already in his heart.

This account of David’s sin and the teaching of Jesus show that selfishness is at the core of adulterous thoughts and actions. Selfishness causes one to view another person as a source of pleasure instead of as the child of God they are. Selfishness separates the beauty and intimacy of proper sexual relations from the pleasure associated with it. Such selfishness turns sex into a purely physical act devoid of any deeper meaning.

Thinking wrongly about sex undermines the bond of intimacy that is the foundation of marital unity. This is why Jesus warned of violating this union. When the beauty of sexual intimacy is lost, the marital bond is weakened. When a man looks at a woman (or a woman at a man) as solely a physical object he is intentionally thinking inappropriately about sex, marriage, and God’s plan for men and women.

It is easy to condemn David for his sin, but the tendency to view sex as a purely physical act meant for personal pleasure is present in all of us. Billions of dollars would not be spent on pornography if there were not a large number of people who pursue sexual pleasure apart from true intimacy. Surveys of Christian men’s use of pornography have shown time and again that men of faith are not immune to such sexual sin. The tendency to violate God’s commandment against adultery seems to be innate, as a result only through intentional effort can it be avoided.

All of us need to look at our lives and evaluate our attitudes about sex and intimacy. We all need to step back and look closely at our lives to make sure that we are building into our lives the protections that will keep ourselves pure and our marriages safe.

- Bart

This is part 6 in a series of posts taken from my book, Life Medicine. I will be speaking on this subject Sunday October 18, 2015 in the Chapel (not main sanctuary) at the Fullerton Evangelical Free Church at 10:00. Video of the message will be uploaded to my Vimeo page in the coming weeks. Comments, questions and shares are always welcome.

The Loneliness that Cancer Brings

Two young children and a husband with cancer. It was impossible not to worry. She tried to be positive and supportive, but the fears were inescapable. What if the cancer spread? How many years did they have left? If her worst fears materialized, how would she make it?

Her husband either did not share or fears or did a much better job of suppressing them. Like so many cancer patients I have seen he decided that talking and worrying didn’t change anything, so he focused on getting back to work and a sense of normalcy. He kept the details of his Illness a secret to his friends and his extended family, preferring to avoid the questions and the scrutiny.

While this modified form of denial seemed to work well for him it was difficult for her. Unable to share the secret she often felt alone in her grief and worry. She longed to be able to tell others, shed tears, and receive hugs and prayers.

Theirs is not an uncommon tale. A cancer diagnosis is typically more difficult for family members than it is for the patient. The patient focuses on treatments and recovery, the family just worries.

The stress of family members illustrates another common aspect of our society, isolation and lack of community. Deep friendships and meaningful relationships are increasingly rare. People focus on work and family with little time for anything else. Acquaintances are made with other parents through youth sports and activities but there is little opportunity for serious conversations at soccer games and pizza parties. When difficult times come people often have no where to turn.

Years ago I heard a pastor bring this point home by asking the question, “If your husband or wife was in the ICU facing death, who would you want sitting by your side?” Most people struggled to come up with more than a handful of names.

The pastor’s question and the young mother’s struggles serve as a powerful reminder of how important it is to develop friendships and invest in the lives of others. We never know when we may need encouragement and support or when others may need us.

- Bart

Comments and questions are welcomed. You can subscribe to the blog by clicking the button on the page, or you can be notified of posts via twitter @bartbarrettmd. You can share posts with others by clicking one of the share icons that follow the post, it is the only way others learn of the blog

Adultery and the Road to Destruction

12 divorces. When I add together the divorces in the immediate families of me and my wife there have been twelve divorces. I have had a front row seat to the tragedy that divorce wreaks on those it touches. As a result every time I hear of a patient’s marriage ending my heart breaks. I mourn for the couple and I mourn for their children. Too often divorce is a direct result of sexual failing.

God made marriage and with it He made the family. It is the primary vehicle for religious instruction and training and it is designed to be representative of man’s relationship with God (Eph 5–6). As a result, God has a vested interest in healthy, intact families. Robust, godly families are the objective of the commandment against adultery. Adultery destroys families and is (understandably) hated by the God who created them.

To see the horrible consequences of adultery one need look no further than the story of the Israelite King David and the woman Bathsheba (2 Sam 11–12). David’s lust for another man’s wife led to adultery, murder, and ultimately the death of a child. As the years passed, David’s family was plagued by idolatry, immorality, incestuous rape, and sibling murder. David’s unfaithfulness in adultery weakened the foundations of his family––with devastating long-term effects.

From David’s story we learn about the roots of adultery as well. David’s sin was not a spontaneous act arising out of a chance encounter. Although he pursued Bathsheba only after he had unintentionally observed her bathing, the seeds of immorality had taken root many years earlier. A close look at the life of David reveals that his sin with Bathsheba was not the first time he had made a wrong decision about a woman. As with all sin, David’s adultery began with a wrong attitude of the heart. Just like David, if we do not avoid the attitudes and desires that can lead us astray, we will fail in our quest to live sexually pure lives.

The story of David’s relationships with women began many years prior to Bathsheba. When David killed the Philistine giant Goliath (1 Sam 17), he was promised the daughter of King Saul as his wife. Although the promised daughter was eventually given to another man, Saul ultimately gave his other daughter Michal to be David’s wife. David’s response to Saul’s offer of his daughter’s hand tells us much about David as a man. We see from the story that David was a humble man who did not consider himself worthy to be the king’s son-in-law. This initial attitude of believing himself unworthy of such a wife suggests David began with a healthy appreciation of the blessing that a wife is.

David’s attitude is well described in the text:

Then Saul ordered his attendants: “Speak to David privately and say, ‘Look, the king is pleased with you, and his attendants all like you; now become his son-in-law.’ They repeated these words to David. But David said, “Do you think it is a small matter to become the king’s son-in-law? I’m only a poor man and little known.” (1 Sam 18:22–23)

At this point in David’s life he was a humble shepherd boy. Although he was adored by the people of Israel, who danced and sang “Saul has slain his thousands, and David his tens of thousands” when David returned from killing Goliath (1 Sam 18:5–7), David refused to view himself as better than anyone else.

Unfortunately for David, this attitude did not last. Not long after David took Saul’s daughter Michal as his wife, Saul turned against David and tried to kill him. David and a small band of soldiers found themselves on the run from Saul and his men. They moved from place to place to avoid being captured and killed by King Saul. Eventually they arrived at a desert in a place called Maon. Near where they were staying lived a wealthy but unpleasant man by the name of Nabal. Nabal was married to Abigail, a beautiful and intelligent woman (1 Sam 25:3).

David sent men to Nabal and asked if he might give some blessing and aid to David and his men. Nabal responded to David in a rude and demeaning way:

Nabal answered David’s servants, “Who is this David? Who is this son of Jesse? Many servants are breaking away from their masters these days. Why should I take my bread and water, and the meat I have slaughtered for my shearers, and give it to men coming from who knows where?” (1 Sam 25:10–11)

Nabal said of David something very similar to what David had said of himself a short while earlier. Nabal asked, “Who is this David?” Although David had once questioned his own worthiness when it came to marrying the king’s daughter, the events that followed show that the humble Who am I? David was gone. In his place was a man filled with a sense of importance and entitlement. Who am I? David had been replaced by How dare he talk to me that way! David. Nabal’s response was an insult to this new David, so David and his men took up arms and set off to avenge their impugned honor.

With vengeance in their hearts they approached the place where Nabal lived. It was their intent to kill not only Nabal, but also every man who worked for him. Only the wise intervention of Abigail prevented a terrible slaughter. She met David and his men while they were coming to attack, bringing food and gifts to appease David’s anger. Her thoughtful actions saved the life of her foolish husband and the lives of their servants as well.

Ten days after Abigail’s shrewd actions, Nabal died. The beautiful, intelligent, and wealthy Abigail was suddenly single and available––all of which certainly did not go unnoticed. Travelling with David were some 600 men. I have no doubt there was at least one single man among those serving David who would have loved to be blessed with such an amazing woman as a wife. As ecstatic as one of David’s men would have been to marry Abigail, none of them were given the chance. Even though he was already married, David decided that he deserved Abigail more than anyone else did. He took her as his second wife.

David had changed. He had gone from someone who felt he did not deserve a wife at all to someone who felt entitled to more than one. He had gone from someone who served others to someone who believed that others existed for him. Here, in his decision to take Abigail, we see the beginning of the attitude that led to his moral failure with Bathsheba. The act with Bathsheba revealed the culmination of the mindset that he was entitled to any woman he wanted. Instead of being a physical expression of the union of one man and one woman, for David sexual intimacy became about his own personal pleasure. He exchanged God’s beautiful plan of intimacy for irrational lust, a compulsion that led to his adultery with Bathsheba and the resultant devastating consequences.

It is my prayer that we all learn the lesson of David and take intentional steps to guard ourselves and protect our marriages. It is the greatest of all earthly endeavors.

- Bart 

This is the 5th in an 8 part series on Adultery, taken from my book Life Medicine, an exploration and application of the principles of the 10 Commandments. The book is available at Amazon. If you are interested in purchasing copies for your church or small group, please contact me through the site to get the books at cost. A small group study guide is linked from the book page on this site, and my sermon series on the book can me accessed on my vimeo page. 

Mass Shootings, Mental Health and Gun Control. A Medical Response

Americans are angry. Left or right, rich or poor, white or black or brown or yellow, we are all angry. 9 people are dead, killed on a community college campus by a lunatic with a grudge against humanity. As always happens after such senseless tragedies the national conversation has focused on one question. What can be done?

There is a sense that we “have to do something," but there is little agreement on what that something is. It reminds me of the patient who called to tell me about her advancing cancer. She had been diagnosed months previously and been told that there was no cure. She felt she had to do something so she went to Mexico and pursued multiple alternative therapies. They were unproven and ultimately ineffective but doing nothing did not seem like a viable option. The family wasted thousands of dollars and countless days pursuing the dream of a cure yet changed nothing.

Her story provides a reference point for any discussion about guns in America. Gun violence is terrible, mass shootings are an evil blight on our society, and too many young and innocent people have lost their lives. There is a naturally intense desire for something to be done. That desire is so strong that we need to exercise caution, as it can result in our doing things that ease our guilt and calm our fears but do nothing to actually solve the problem.

As I listen to proposed solutions there are two that are most often repeated. Many say we need stricter gun laws, that we need to make it more difficult for bad people to obtain guns. Others say we need to improve treatment of the mentally ill so we can identify potentially dangerous people in advance. The question that needs to be asked is, “Will these treatments cure the disease?”

When it comes to stricter gun laws it is logical to assume that making it more difficult to obtain a weapon would make crime less likely to occur. As logical as it may appear the truth is that gun laws are as worthless at stopping gun crime as coffee enemas are at curing cancer. Cancer cells are not impacted by coffee in the colon and criminals don’t respond to gun laws. The shootings in Newton, Connecticut and at the community college in Oregon both occurred in states with strict gun laws. A recent survey of men incarcerated for violent crimes confirmed that over 95% of them purchased their weapons illegally. Strict gun laws would not have stopped any of them.

What if we eliminated guns altogether? To return to the cancer analogy, proposing that we remove all of the diseased cells from a person’s body sounds wonderful, but it is impossible and therefore not worth discussing. In a nation with over 300,000,000 million firearms there is no rational or viable way to remove guns from our society. When we remember that we have thousands of miles of unsecured borders and that in such a scenario black market gun sales would be lucrative, such a proposal is not reasonable.

As desperately as we all long to live in a nation where mass shootings do not exist, an honest and thoughtful evaluation of the issue leads to the conclusion that the answer to the problem cannot be found in stricter gun laws. These laws, like alternative medicine for cancer, allow us to feel as if we are doing something and address our need to not feel powerless and to have a sense of hope but offer no chance of curing the disease.

Many have therefore declared that the solution within reach is for us to do a better job of caring for the mentally ill in our society. If we could identify and treat the potentially violent among us the problem might go away. As lovely as this sounds, honest mental health practitioners will admit that there is no effective way to identify these individuals. Those of us who treat mental illness on a regular basis (I see patients with depression, anxiety or bipolar disease daily) can tell you that not all patients who need therapy will consent to it. For patients with personality disorders and bipolar disease refusal of treatment is so common that it is expected.

What most Americans do not know is that the NIH estimates that in any given year 2.2% of the American adult population will suffer from severe bipolar disease. In 2014 that equates to 5,400,000 people. When we add in the 2,690,000 people with Antisocial Personality disorder, and the 2,450,000 people with schizophrenia, we have over 10 million mentally ill adults with diagnoses that might lead to violence. Given the rarity of mass shootings it would literally be easier to find the needle in the haystack. Mental health care in our country is a disaster and it needs to be fixed but any who think that this is the answer to mass shootings is dealing with a different kind of altered reality.

So what can we do?

1-      We can quit glorifying the perpetrators. Media should never release their names. I am personally in favor of all mass shooters being addressed by a derogatory term (I like “pathetic loser”). It will not eliminate the problem, but it will cost nothing and infringe on no one’s rights if the news anchor said, “9 People are dead at a community college in Oregon after a Pathetic Loser opened fire in a classroom.” Let’s remove some of the incentive.

2-      We can be honest about our options and likelihood of success. We do each other no favors when we mean-spiritedly debate proposals that will ultimately accomplish little.

3-      Let’s be willing to consider uncomfortable alternatives. We need to improve the ability of institutions and individuals to defend themselves against attacks. We should consider having trained and armed guards at schools and other vulnerable locations and give thought to allowing trained and qualified civilians who pass appropriate screenings to carry weapons if they so desire. While the thought of millions of Americans having the ability to carry a concealed handgun makes many uncomfortable, the fact is that over 4 million Americans already do, and that the incidence of crime or misuse of weapons for such individuals is lower than that of police officers.

-          Bart

I typically avoid political posts, and tried to remain objective. Thoughtful questions and comments are welcomed. Feel free to share this post with others.